Hey, there were some things missing from the faction group pages which I've added here (economic/naval units and companion brigade types). I don't know if the page is structured well enough this way (especially regarding the companion table). If you can tell me this format is ok or change it how you like, I can then implement the same thing for the other faction groups. Let me know whenever is convenient for you. Fristi61 (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
The faction group pages were still marked as stubs so I figured I'd turn this one into an example of a more fleshed out faction group page here. If this is good, I will implement the same for the other faction groups. Let me know if you think anything is missing. Fristi61 (talk) 10:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
It is very good, the history part is exactly what was missing to give it context. Thumbs up! KR777 (talk) 11:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I have inserted an "Overview" heading in the greek and etruscan faction group page to give it just a bit more structure - I hope you don't mind. KR777 (talk) 18:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, all good. I followed suit for the Illyric page. I will probably do the remaining faction groups tomorrow. Fristi61 (talk) 19:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey, cool. You could also use the quote format for the in-game descriptions of the faction groups, just to add a bit more variety - e.g. for the Etruscan this would look as follows:
| “ | The Etruscans draw from their hierarchy of social classes to fill a diverse roster ranging from their unique axemen to the heavy hoplites and cavalry. | „ |
| ~ In-game Description |
KR777 (talk) 20:16, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Yeah that looks nice. Not sure where the best place is to put it. At the top of the page like this? Fristi61 (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
I would just leave it in the overview section (...like this...) KR777 (talk) 20:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Oh I see. Changed it for the other faction groups that I'd fleshed out so far as well Fristi61 (talk) 20:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)